- From: Andrew Sutherland <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2017 11:40:59 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 18:42:05 UTC
@laukstein Can you elaborate on your use-case, particularly in how it would work in terms of updates? It's not clear to me whether you want to use the parameters to avoid having to include, for example, https://github.com/GoogleChrome/sw-toolbox configuration in the SW script itself. Or if the parameter would be something higher level, such as picking which branch/release of an app to use (such as is discussed in https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1085). Also of relevance is how you would plan to detect and correct ServiceWorkers stuck with a bad parameter configuration. Aside: If you're concerned about additional downloads of sw.js, you may also want to consider using useCache=true and ensuring your server has appropriate cache settings, because SW's really like to do update checks. If things aren't well-cached then the script and all its dependencies could be re-downloaded so that the byte-wise comparison check can be performed. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1157#issuecomment-306269374
Received on Monday, 5 June 2017 18:42:05 UTC