Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Share API (#170)

Hi Andrew,

Thanks. I didn't actually get CC'd on this until now. It also seems we inadvertently opened a second TAG review on this: #179 so discussion is continuing there.

Specification draft is now up: https://wicg.github.io/web-share/

In response to your questions:
> Can we have the feedback from the origin trial when it's available?
The [M56 Origin Trial results](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/rgIpGcOyDKI) is still the best set of feedback we have. We also published the [M57 results](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/kSEGnTX2dsA) but they didn't really add any new info.

> We would like to see how extended service-specfic metadata could be included in the share action (eg twitter related accounts)

I'm not exactly sure what this means, but I'm not really keen to add anything service-specific to the share action, because the point is that any service should be able to handle the request.

Having broad concepts that apply more to certain services is OK, for example [Twitter's intent API](https://dev.twitter.com/web/tweet-button/web-intent) includes a "hashtags" field which we could put into the `ShareData` in the future. That's a little bit Twitter-specific but is sufficiently generic that it can be used (or ignored) by other services as well.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/170#issuecomment-305666908

Received on Friday, 2 June 2017 01:48:26 UTC