- From: Terence Eden <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 01:31:04 -0700
- To: w3c/charter-html <charter-html@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 31 July 2017 08:31:45 UTC
There are a couple of (admittedly loose) metrics that could be used. * Browser adoption. For example, [`srcset` isn't supported in several prominent browsers](http://caniuse.com/#search=srcset). Is that a problem with the spec - or something else? * Impact. For example [Ink Markup Language](https://www.w3.org/TR/InkML/) was published in 2011. Has it had the impact that the authors wanted? If not, what should have been done differently. * Security fallout. For example the [Vibration API](https://www.w3.org/TR/vibration/) has been well adopted, but has continually been a target for spammers and has some security implications. Given what we know now, what would the authors change? * Community adoption. It might be interesting to work with GitHub to see if their users have started using specifications. For example, [EmotionML was published in 2014](https://www.w3.org/TR/emotionml/) - but today [there are only 70 files in the whole of GitHub which use the `appraisal-set` attribute](https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=%22%3Cemotion+appraisal-set%22&type=Code). Most of those seem to be referencing the specification. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/charter-html/issues/147#issuecomment-319002806
Received on Monday, 31 July 2017 08:31:45 UTC