- From: Victor Costan <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 12:28:51 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 19:29:33 UTC
@aliams Sorry if I misunderstood your suggestion, but merely serializing the execution of `getDatabaseNames` doesn't seem sufficient to me. Another transaction could sneak in between the `getDatabaseNames` transaction and a subsequent `indexedDB.open` transaction. This results in an unintuitive behavior where `indexedDB.open` would error out when given a database returned by `getDatabaseNames`, because a delete transaction snuck between `getDatabaseNames` and `indexedDB.open`. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/31#issuecomment-318462846
Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 19:29:33 UTC