Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Review Request for OpenType Variable Fonts Additions to CSS Fonts Module Level 4 (#183)

@travisleithead, @plinss, @hadleybeeman, and I just discussed this a bit at the TAG meeting.  I think we were all inclined to agree with the idea (per w3c/csswg-drafts#1652) that a descriptor feels better than a property because of fallback.  Though @plinss brought up the issue of animation, but I wasn't really sure how important a use case animation really is.  (Perhaps it becomes more valuable to animate things like `font-weight` now that they can be animated with fidelity, though.)

Otherwise I don't think we have any other feedback.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/183#issuecomment-318399617

Received on Thursday, 27 July 2017 15:37:37 UTC