- From: Addison Phillips <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 17:08:12 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 17:08:44 UTC
It is wrong to say that I18N has no issues: we have 9 issues against IndexedDB. I have just now reviewed the disposition of these and think that you have addressed all but one (#173 which duplicates #38). You have also closed #180 but I haven't had time to review the examples to see if I agree with @inexorabletash yet. However, I think that issue is *at best* editorial and would not object to seeing your specification proceed. I would like to see #38 addressed. Is your intention to handle this in a future revision? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/112#issuecomment-318119531
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 17:08:44 UTC