- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 13:12:37 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2017 20:13:18 UTC
Seems plausible. I'm don't like the ever-growing list of methods as we add query types one by one and thus need to make them feature detectable, but we haven't come up with a good pattern for feature detecting options. (Or maybe we have and I just don't know?) Crazy thoughts like `query(range, {options})` and then a helper like `queryOptions({options})` that returns the options dict back to you as it was parsed (so unsupported options would vanish). But we should solve that for the whole platform, not just this spec/feature. Is this a hint that Edge might be implementing here? :) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/130#issuecomment-316816638
Received on Thursday, 20 July 2017 20:13:18 UTC