- From: Ilya Grigorik <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 11:57:46 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/566@github.com>
Related notes and discussion from [blink-dev thread](https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!topic/blink-dev/QHI3sio6--Q).. > On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 12:25:06 AM UTC-7, Ilya Grigorik wrote: >> On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Tarun Bansal <tbansal@chromium.org> wrote: >>> Spec >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-client-hints-04#section-6.2 >> >> It seems this would also require corresponding changes to Fetch? > > I think we already have correct logic [1] within the fetch algorithm. However, there is a missing bit there for how "client hint list" [2] is populated, which is what this update is implicitly tackling. We previously said that this will be defined upstream in the IETF doc, but in retrospect.. I don't think that makes sense, as we're missing all the necessary hooks there. If it makes sense to you, I'd propose we integrate this logic as part of Fetch. WDYT? > > [1] https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#dfnReturnLink-1 > [2] https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#client-hints-list ... > On Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 7:27:54 AM UTC-7, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Sounds good. Since it's a response header the other part I was > thinking of is defining when it's parsed/handled. In particular > whether it's handled in responses from service workers or only in > responses from the network. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/566
Received on Friday, 14 July 2017 18:58:14 UTC