- From: Max <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 07:56:23 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 14:56:55 UTC
I reckon no attempt needs to be made to ensure the results remain valid after the function call returns values. I would suggest leaving it up to the application author to deal with it. That said, a separate function like hasDatabase(name) would be useful, with the proviso that other open/create requests for the same name would be queued until after the current code finishes dealing with IndexedDB (I'm not familiar with the implementation enough to suggest a specific mechanism for this). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/31#issuecomment-313705419
Received on Friday, 7 July 2017 14:56:55 UTC