- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 07:00:39 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:01:11 UTC
@jakearchibald I think that would create the false impression that the abort steps would run concurrently. However, I might not fully grasp the setup. Maybe if we only used that for the parts where Fetch is "blocking" (waiting for a network response for instance) it could work out okay? I suspect long term we'll hit some other wall though and have to refactor all the things anyway, but avoiding it for now would be nice. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/523#issuecomment-312885526
Received on Tuesday, 4 July 2017 14:01:11 UTC