Re: [whatwg/url] It's not immediately clear that "URL syntax" and "URL parser" conflict (#118)

> If it is accepted, it isn't a violation. You invent new meanings for established words.

Yeah, this.

If `http:///////example.org/` is supposed to be parsed as `http://example.org/`, any "syntax checker" isn't actually checking for violations: it's just checking for compression opportunities.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/118#issuecomment-276316270