Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) from Stuart P. Bentley on 2017-01-25 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from January 2017)

From: Stuart P. Bentley <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 12:08:53 -0800
To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/447/275218788@github.com>

re: naming `FetchObserver` in a way so as to not be entangled with TC39 Observables etc, what about calling it `FetchReporter`? (I was thinking of `FetchEventSource` to denote that the API is `addEventListener`, but I could see that being confusing for ServiceWorker where there's an actual source of events called `fetch`.)

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-275218788

Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 20:09:25 UTC