- From: Rick Byers <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:10:22 -0800
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:11:01 UTC
Thanks @scheib, that makes it very concrete and I agree completely. I don't see any good reason why event c would need to have movementX/Y==0 so I'd prefer we leave things as spec'd. I think the only challenge here is that @NavidZ was trying to test events c and v in relative isolation from the other events. I don't think that makes sense. The only way to validate that the movement in events c and v are correct is to communicate with the parent frame somehow (so one frame or the other knows about the b-c and u-v delta). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/16#issuecomment-275151076
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2017 16:11:01 UTC