Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447)

@blesh 

> I'd caution against using "observer" as an API name unless it's the same as the observer API from the observable proposal.

As far as I know, the fetch API doesn't have any dependencies on DOM APIs, and I believe that's intentional. So yeah, I was thinking actual observers, although that gives us a TC39 dependency which hasn't been great so far. Controlling can ship before observing, though.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-274821081