- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:13:05 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:13:53 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request.
>     <li>
-    <p>Let <var>reader</var> be the result of <a lt="get a reader" for=ReadableStream>getting a reader</a>
-    from <var>dummyStream</var>.
-    <p class="note no-backref">This operation will not throw an exception.
-
-   <li>
-    <p><a lt="read all bytes" for=ReadableStream>Read all bytes</a> from
-    <var>dummyStream</var> with <var>reader</var>.
-    <p class="note no-backref">This operation makes <var>dummyStream</var> disturbed.
+    <p>Let <var>rs</var> bs a {{ReadableStream}} object from which one can read the exactly
+    same data as one could read from <var>inputBody</var>'s <a for=body>stream</a>.
+    <p class="note no-backref">This will be specified more precisely once
+    <a href=https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#ts-model>transform stream</a> and
+    <a href=https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#pipe-chains>piping</a> are precisely defined.
+    This makes <var>inputBody</var>'s <a for=body>stream</a> <a for=ReadableStream>locked</a> and
+    <a for=ReadableStream>disturbed</a> immediately.
Thanks, this PR looks good to me now, but we will need tests per the new process.
-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/458
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:13:53 UTC