- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 01:13:05 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:13:53 UTC
annevk commented on this pull request. > <li> - <p>Let <var>reader</var> be the result of <a lt="get a reader" for=ReadableStream>getting a reader</a> - from <var>dummyStream</var>. - <p class="note no-backref">This operation will not throw an exception. - - <li> - <p><a lt="read all bytes" for=ReadableStream>Read all bytes</a> from - <var>dummyStream</var> with <var>reader</var>. - <p class="note no-backref">This operation makes <var>dummyStream</var> disturbed. + <p>Let <var>rs</var> bs a {{ReadableStream}} object from which one can read the exactly + same data as one could read from <var>inputBody</var>'s <a for=body>stream</a>. + <p class="note no-backref">This will be specified more precisely once + <a href=https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#ts-model>transform stream</a> and + <a href=https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#pipe-chains>piping</a> are precisely defined. + This makes <var>inputBody</var>'s <a for=body>stream</a> <a for=ReadableStream>locked</a> and + <a for=ReadableStream>disturbed</a> immediately. Thanks, this PR looks good to me now, but we will need tests per the new process. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/458
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2017 09:13:53 UTC