- From: Takeshi Yoshino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 23:31:30 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 07:32:31 UTC
> I like it better actually. Ready normally rejects ASAP to indicate that writing now is useless, whereas closed rejects later so that it can provide a guarantee that everything has reached a stable state. Here both things happen together, but it's good to be consistent. Ideally ready would reject first or second, but it seems unimportant. Thanks, ricea. Sorry I didn't state what my concern was in the post at that time.I think ready -> closed order is fine, but wondered that it might make sense that abort() reject after write() and close() in queue. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/655#issuecomment-274417868
Received on Monday, 23 January 2017 07:32:31 UTC