- From: Adam Rice <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2017 07:07:17 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/streams/pull/655/review/17680963@github.com>
ricea commented on this pull request.
Logic changes lgtm.
> @@ -109,6 +109,25 @@ function IsWritableStreamLocked(stream) {
return true;
}
+function WritableStreamEnsureReadyPromiseRejectedWith(stream, error, isPending) {
I feel that this is actually a WritableStreamDefaultWriter operation. The only place it's called without a stream._writer !== undefined check is inside DefaultWriter itself.
WritableStreamDefaultWriterEnsureReadyPromiseRejectedWith is a very long name but I think I can live with it.
> + }).then(() => {
+ assert_array_equals(events, [], 'writePromise, abortPromise and writer.closed must be not rejected yet');
+
+ rejectWrite(error2);
+
+ return Promise.all([
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, writePromise,
+ 'writePromise must reject with the error returned from the sink\'s write method'),
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, abortPromise,
+ 'abortPromise must reject with the error returned from the sink\'s write method'),
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, writer.closed,
+ 'writer.closed must reject with the error returned from the sink\'s write method'),
+ flushAsyncEvents()
+ ]);
+ }).then(() => {
+ const writePromise3 = writer.write('a');
I would find it more emotionally satisfying if you checked the contents of `events` again here. Adding all those strings to it created a powerful sense of anticipation. Otherwise you could have just used a counter.
> + events, [],
+ 'writePromise, abortPromise and writer.closed must be not fulfilled/rejected yet even after '
+ + 'controller.error() call');
+
+ resolveWrite();
+
+ return Promise.all([
+ writePromise,
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, abortPromise,
+ 'abortPromise must reject with the error passed to the controller\'s error method'),
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, writer.closed,
+ 'writer.closed must reject with the error passed to the controller\'s error method'),
+ flushAsyncEvents()
+ ]);
+ }).then(() => {
+ const writePromise4 = writer.write('a');
Again, it would make me happy if you could check `events` here.
> + });
+
+ abortPromise = writer.abort(error1);
+ abortPromise.catch(() => {
+ events.push('abortPromise');
+ });
+
+ const writePromise2 = writer.write('a');
+
+ return Promise.all([
+ promise_rejects(t, new TypeError(), writePromise2, 'writePromise2 must reject with an error indicating abort'),
+ promise_rejects(t, new TypeError(), writer.ready, 'writer.ready must reject with an error indicating abort'),
+ flushAsyncEvents()
+ ]);
+ }).then(() => {
+ assert_array_equals(events, [], 'writePromise, abortPromise and writer.closed must be not fulfilled/rejected yet');
s/be not/not be/. Also below.
> + events.push('writePromise');
+ });
+
+ controller.error(error2);
+
+ const writePromise2 = writer.write('a');
+
+ return Promise.all([
+ promise_rejects(t, new TypeError(), writePromise2,
+ 'writePromise2 must reject with an error indicating the stream has already been errored'),
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, writer.ready,
+ 'writer.ready must reject with the error passed to the controller\'s error method'),
+ flushAsyncEvents()
+ ]);
+ }).then(() => {
+ assert_array_equals(events, [], 'writePromise and writer.closed must be rejected yet');
"must **not** be rejected". Also below.
> +
+ controller.error(error2);
+
+ const writePromise2 = writer.write('a');
+
+ return Promise.all([
+ promise_rejects(t, new TypeError(), writePromise2,
+ 'writePromise2 must reject with an error indicating the stream has already been errored'),
+ promise_rejects(t, error2, writer.ready,
+ 'writer.ready must reject with the error passed to the controller\'s error method'),
+ flushAsyncEvents()
+ ]);
+ }).then(() => {
+ assert_array_equals(events, [], 'writePromise and writer.closed must be rejected yet');
+
+ abortPromise = writer.abort(error1);
Also put .catch(() => event.push(...)) here so we can check it isn't called too early?
> @@ -213,4 +219,96 @@ promise_test(() => {
});
}, 'the promise returned by async abort during close should resolve');
+// Though the order of the promises is not important, we're checking it for interoperability. We can change the order
I suggest "arbitrary" rather than "not important". Also, maybe "order in which the promises are fulfilled or rejected"?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/streams/pull/655#pullrequestreview-17680963
Received on Friday, 20 January 2017 15:07:56 UTC