- From: Vincent Scheib <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 11:03:11 -0800
- To: w3c/pointerlock <pointerlock@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 19:04:26 UTC
;( Ok, well that's not desired, so we can either see if the impl can work around that, or I'm also OK adding to the spec a clearing at iframe boundaries just to make impls easy... I don't think it would have a large negative impact to applications to miss that first data packet, while the large jumps are very seriously broken. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/pointerlock/issues/16#issuecomment-273866816
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2017 19:04:26 UTC