Re: [whatwg/url] Is file:///C|/foo/bar meant to be a syntax violation? (#209)

I think one thing that could be clearer in the current spec is the high level division of URLs into: 

- conforming URLs
- non-conforming, but parsable URLs (syntax violations)
- non-parsable URLs (return failure)

Adding some syntax violations to the examples table would make this clearer. Would be good to add file: URLs to the examples table (both conforming and non-conforming) since the long history of interop problems with file: URLs suggests they're a source of much confusion, so need most clarity. 





-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/209#issuecomment-273044844