- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:41:56 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2017 06:42:29 UTC
@mkruisselbrink, from https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/829#issuecomment-180536147, > So yes, removing the associated client from ServiceWorker and ServiceWorkerRegistration is probably the sanest solution This was done in other patches already. This PR addresses using the right value for resolving the equivalent jobs' promises. Please review. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1054#issuecomment-272088760
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2017 06:42:29 UTC