- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 15:55:56 -0800
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 23:56:27 UTC
Found by @tschneidereit: - [new ReadableStreamDefaultController](https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#rs-default-controller-constructor) step 11.a.iv. -> - [ReadableStreamDefaultControllerCallPullIfNeeded](https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#readable-stream-default-controller-call-pull-if-needed) step 1 -> - [ReadableStreamDefaultControllerShouldCallPull](https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#readable-stream-default-controller-should-call-pull) step 5 -> - [ReadableStreamGetNumReadRequests](https://streams.spec.whatwg.org/#readable-stream-get-num-read-requests) which assumes _stream_.[[reader]].[[readRequests]] exists, which is not true for byte readers. Untested, but I think the repro code is then something like: ```js const rs = new ReadableStream({ type: "bytes" }); const reader = rs.getReader(); ``` @tschneidereit mentions that his Gecko implementation is failing the test "ReadableStream with byte source: autoAllocateChunkSize", whereas the reference implementation for some reason is not. --- I think the correct fix here is to bail in ReadableStreamDefaultControllerCallPullIfNeeded immediately if the reader is not a default reader. @tyoshino, does that sound right? We should also track down the missing test coverage though. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/646
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 23:56:27 UTC