Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve handling of extend lifetime promises (#1049)

Yeah, "wait until-but-also-wait-an-extra-turn" the argument is the original problem statement and the behavior people agreed on. With your comment, I sort of come to think of again whether this was a right decision but would like to settle on what we decided.

For the spec wording, which of the following would be better?
```
Upon fulfillment of promise, queue a task to decrease event’s pending promises count by one.
Upon rejection of promise, queue a task to decrease event’s pending promises count by one.
```
or
```
Upon fulfillment or rejection of promise, queue a task to decrease event’s pending promises count by one.
```
or
```
Upon settlement of promise, queue a task to decrease event’s pending promises count by one.
```

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1049#issuecomment-271764120