Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Improve handling of extend lifetime promises (#1049)

Hmm I guess that does appear in https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1039#issue-197049082. I think that's a bad design, but it's not a huge deal. I guess if you want that you can just do "upon fulfillment/rejection, queue a task".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1049#issuecomment-271760676

Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2017 02:30:00 UTC