- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 01:34:00 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/425/review/15270859@github.com>
annevk commented on this pull request. > + <ol> + <li><p>Set <var>httpRequest</var> to a copy of <var>request</var> except for its + <a for=request>body</a>. + + <li><p>Let <var>body</var> be <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a>. + + <li><p>Set <var>httpRequest</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> to <var>body</var>. + + <li><p>If <var>body</var> is non-null, then set <var>request</var>'s <a for=request>body</a> to a + new <a for=/>body</a> whose <a for=body>stream</a> is null and whose <a for=body>source</a> is + <var>body</var>'s <a for=body>source</a>. + </ol> + + <p class="note no-backref">Here we do not <a for=request>clone</a> <var>request</var> in order + to reduce memory consumption. <var>request</var> can be reused with redirects, authentication, + and proxy authentication. This note is still problematic I think compared to the original. I think it should say something like the following: > A _request_ is copied as _httpRequest_ here as we need to be able to add headers to _httpRequest_ and read its body without affecting _request_. Namely, _request_ can be reused with redirects, authentication, and proxy authentication. We copy rather than clone in order to reduce memory consumption. In case _request_'s body's source is a ReadableStream object, redirects and authentication will end up failing the fetch. Does that make sense to you? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/425#pullrequestreview-15270859
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2017 09:34:35 UTC