Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] README note seems wrongish (#1047)

V1 is also in the scope of the works this repo maintains. So, I think the readme should clarify the works. Would the following change make sense?

> For the nitty-gritty of the API, the draft W3C specifications are authoritative. [Service Workers Nightly](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/) is a living document where all the up-to-date features are being developed. [Service Workers 1](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/v1) is a version that is advancing toward a W3C Recommendation. For implementers and developers who seek all the latest features, [Service Workers Nightly](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/) is a right document that is constantly reflecting new requirements. For implementers and developers who seek a version that is stabilizing without introducing new developing features, [Service Workers 1](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/v1/) is a right document with which the contributors only focus on fixing bugs and resolving compatibility issues.
>
> Currently, version 1 does not include features such as link-and-header-based installation, foreign fetch, and navigation preload.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1047#issuecomment-270549648