- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 20:25:32 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 04:26:04 UTC
> it makes for an explicit ServiceWorkerContainer -> service worker client mapping What spec says is not a mapping between a `ServiceWorkerContainer` and a _service worker client_. ServiceWorkerContainer's associated [service worker client](https://w3c.github.io/ServiceWorker/#serviceworkercontainer-service-worker-client) explicitly defines a reference to the service worker client of the `Window/Navigator` where `ServiceWorkerClient` is tied. I don't see a problem in this definition. > The null-check still makes no sense Agreed. The _destination_ should be initialized to null and should remain null if it doesn't get a target object. I'll address that point. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1042#issuecomment-270050446
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2017 04:26:04 UTC