- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:02:41 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/pull/320/review/23571831@github.com>
domenic approved this pull request. A few nits, LGTM overall. > listed in the [=error names table=] below. The table also indicates the {{DOMException}}'s integer code for that error name, if it has one. There are two types that can be used to refer to exception objects: -{{Error!!interface}}, which encompasses all exceptions, -and {{DOMException}} which includes just DOMException objects. +{{DOMException}} and {{Error!!interface}}, Maybe ", where the latter encompasses..." > @@ -7692,7 +7691,7 @@ that correspond to the union’s [=member types=]. IDL {{Error!!interface}} values are represented by native ECMAScript <emu-val>Error</emu-val> objects and -platform objects for {{DOMException|DOMExceptions}}. +platform objects for {{DOMException}} objects. "and by {{DOMException}} platform objects" perhaps > @@ -7716,8 +7715,7 @@ platform objects for {{DOMException|DOMExceptions}}. <h4 id="es-DOMException">DOMException</h4> -IDL {{DOMException}} values are represented -by platform objects for {{DOMException|DOMExceptions}}. +IDL {{DOMException}} values are represented by [=platform objects=]. Comparing this sentence to the rest of the ones in this section, it makes very little sense. I would just remove it. Or maaaybe replace it with "IDL {{DOMException}} values are represented by ECMAScript Object values" (cf. interfaces). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/320#pullrequestreview-23571831
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 20:03:16 UTC