- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 12:02:41 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <heycam/webidl/pull/320/review/23571831@github.com>
domenic approved this pull request.
A few nits, LGTM overall.
> listed in the [=error names table=] below.
The table also indicates the {{DOMException}}'s integer code for that error name,
if it has one.
There are two types that can be used to refer to exception objects:
-{{Error!!interface}}, which encompasses all exceptions,
-and {{DOMException}} which includes just DOMException objects.
+{{DOMException}} and {{Error!!interface}},
Maybe ", where the latter encompasses..."
> @@ -7692,7 +7691,7 @@ that correspond to the union’s [=member types=].
IDL {{Error!!interface}} values are represented
by native ECMAScript <emu-val>Error</emu-val> objects and
-platform objects for {{DOMException|DOMExceptions}}.
+platform objects for {{DOMException}} objects.
"and by {{DOMException}} platform objects" perhaps
> @@ -7716,8 +7715,7 @@ platform objects for {{DOMException|DOMExceptions}}.
<h4 id="es-DOMException">DOMException</h4>
-IDL {{DOMException}} values are represented
-by platform objects for {{DOMException|DOMExceptions}}.
+IDL {{DOMException}} values are represented by [=platform objects=].
Comparing this sentence to the rest of the ones in this section, it makes very little sense. I would just remove it. Or maaaybe replace it with "IDL {{DOMException}} values are represented by ECMAScript Object values" (cf. interfaces).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/320#pullrequestreview-23571831
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 20:03:16 UTC