Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) from Anne van Kesteren on 2017-02-23 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2017)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:48:51 -0800
To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/447/282029829@github.com>

@wanderview with the only (non-)alternative being lazy getters that block script execution, right? I can see how we might want a design that does less message passing.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-282029829

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 15:49:24 UTC