Re: [whatwg/fetch] Aborting a fetch: The Next Generation (#447) from Stuart P. Bentley on 2017-02-23 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from February 2017)

From: Stuart P. Bentley <notifications@github.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 07:30:58 -0800
To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/447/282024525@github.com>

> Those APIs do not have to deal with cross-thread data AFAIK.

>Anyway, we can still do the sync getters. Just want to make sure people understand the implications.

Yeah, so there'd maybe have to be a, what, hundred-odd cycle hitch to wait for a mutex in the event that we're reading the state as a new state is being written? I can live with that.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/447#issuecomment-282024525

Received on Thursday, 23 February 2017 15:31:37 UTC