Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Rework key generator algorithm (#153)

Actually, you don't want to add the incrementing step there.  Those steps you added are for *setting* the key generator when the key is undefined.

(Maybe it would be more clear to say "possibly update the current number" or "possibly update the key generator current number" instead of "possibly update the key generator" since the latter has stronger connotations of incrementing.)

The other changes fixes looked good.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/153#issuecomment-281822090