- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:04:54 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2017 19:05:52 UTC
If HTML had Serialize/Deserialize variants of StructuredClone (as @domenic has suggested somewhere...) then IDB would use that instead. (`put()` and friends would actually need to Serialize and then potentially Deserialize immediately to compute keys against an unobservable, side-effect-free copy. That's what implementations must do today, internally.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/152#issuecomment-281768347
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2017 19:05:52 UTC