Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] SharedArrayBuffer integration (#152)

Okay, I guess then I'd argue it matters how storing on disk is defined, since a naive implementation might copy the bytes lazily which would not work well for SharedArrayBuffer whereas it doesn't matter for ArrayBuffer.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/152#issuecomment-281762767