- From: Nathan Schloss <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:37:32 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 19:38:26 UTC
@jakearchibald, that's our current hack here. It works fine, but like @wanderview said, there's an argument to be made that having it allows for a better level of consistency between SWs and Clients. Also, if the browser is already storing an ID like this it wouldn't be much more work to expose it? Besides that, it really would be nice to have a way for a SW to get it's own ServiceWorker object so it can tell what state it's currently in. I'll file a separate issue for that though. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1076#issuecomment-281455794
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2017 19:38:26 UTC