- From: Peter Beverloo <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:43:46 -0800
- To: w3c/push-api <push-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 19:44:18 UTC
I think PR #234 captures the gist of this issue, and specifically advocates for use of background sync to avoid rolling our own, duplicated logic. Issue #240 tracks the necessary changes to the background sync specification. By including `newSubscription` in the event, we've also defined that the user agent is responsible for actually updating the subscription with the push service. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/push-api/issues/132#issuecomment-280747572
Received on Friday, 17 February 2017 19:44:18 UTC