Re: [whatwg/fetch] preload, destinations, and module scripts (#486)

OK, so it sounds like there's more appetite for (1), a new destination. I can work on the appropriate spec PRs after we settle the remaining questions:

1. Is it OK to have recursive preload behavior, i.e. it fetches the whole module script tree? Basically, I think that would be better, but maybe it doesn't fit with the conception of preload as "declarative fetch", so I wanted to check with people first.
1. Do we also duplicate all the other script-type destinations? I.e. do we create "moduleserviceworker", "modulesharedworker", "moduleworker"? (Another reason why type=module seems nicer...)
1. Is "module" a good destination name, or should it maybe be "modulescript"?


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/486#issuecomment-280141132

Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 21:16:24 UTC