- From: Domenic Denicola <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:15:51 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 21:16:24 UTC
OK, so it sounds like there's more appetite for (1), a new destination. I can work on the appropriate spec PRs after we settle the remaining questions: 1. Is it OK to have recursive preload behavior, i.e. it fetches the whole module script tree? Basically, I think that would be better, but maybe it doesn't fit with the conception of preload as "declarative fetch", so I wanted to check with people first. 1. Do we also duplicate all the other script-type destinations? I.e. do we create "moduleserviceworker", "modulesharedworker", "moduleworker"? (Another reason why type=module seems nicer...) 1. Is "module" a good destination name, or should it maybe be "modulescript"? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/486#issuecomment-280141132
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2017 21:16:24 UTC