- From: Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 11:39:11 -0800
- To: w3c/selection-api <selection-api@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 19:40:40 UTC
I don't think changing the behavior of `Selection`-`Range` relationship like that only in the case where a Range's boundary points is in another document or otherwise disconnected is a good idea. This makes the API's behavior rather hard to predict. We should either spec Gecko/Edge's behavior or what WebKit does, which is that `addRange` doesn't let the original range control selection, and `getRangeAt` makes a new `Range` each time it gets called. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/selection-api/issues/79#issuecomment-279498976
Received on Monday, 13 February 2017 19:40:40 UTC