- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 01:42:48 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2017 09:43:21 UTC
Thanks, I thought I had responded to your question here, but the it seems that didn't get through. The main reason I thought we didn't want nullable records was because you should use undefined for that scenario. Null is essentially a value that isn't really needed here. (Now I understand that for return values we don't really allow undefined or object at the moment, which is a problem that is tracked somewhere I believe.) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/pull/304#issuecomment-279133083
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2017 09:43:21 UTC