Re: [whatwg/url] All the other network schemes (#241)

If you don't limit "URLs" to a specific set of schemes at all, then I'm fine with it. But as this spec is not gonna work for the ones that aren't http/https or ftp, I think it should rather clarify and say that this spec is *only* for [list of schemes] and that the others are out of scope.

> URL would no longer have a specific definition for web user agents / browsers

That was more of a general reply as it is a common argument brought up and the current draft still mentions "Non-web-browser" in one place as a way to say that some category of user-agents should act differently than others.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/241#issuecomment-278894853