Re: [whatwg/url] Document, possibly standardize, "plus" scheme convention (#230)

Right, hence my desire to document the convention, for other library
implementors like myself.

On Feb 9, 2017 2:30 AM, "Anne van Kesteren" <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> That's true, but then it sounds like something that wouldn't really
> influence the parser. Better for a library that takes a URL record and does
> some post-processing.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/230#issuecomment-278604066>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAH8kao_qm134rYNksmZuBQ-BOHCNBfbks5rauq9gaJpZM4L2AGZ>
> .
>


-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/url/issues/230#issuecomment-278607284