Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] A spec style/structure checklist? (#136)

I have fond memories of reading that document when I was starting out. IIRC, it really does cover the basics well.  

The following post by Hixie was probably the most important thing I ever read about how specs should be written:

https://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1140242962&count=1

I also worked on this thing... 

https://www.w3.org/TR/test-methodology/

there might be useful conceptual things in there. 






-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/136#issuecomment-278486520

Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2017 22:43:28 UTC