Re: [w3ctag/spec-reviews] MediaStream Recorder (#131)

The TAG just looked at this in our face-to-face today.

One other thought from me is that the examples could use a little more prose.  For example, in [the second example](https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-record/MediaRecorder.html#example2):
* how does the `video` element relate to what's going on?
* what controls the object lifetimes, i.e., when does the MediaRecorder become GC-able?

We're still interested in seeing work using ReadableStream here, perhaps as a return value from `start()`.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/131#issuecomment-278481083