- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 12:17:43 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 20:18:34 UTC
OK, so that sounds like we should make `record` be more like `sequence` than `dictionary` in the IDL spec, right? That is, it requires an object for its value, doesn't have special "must be optional in trailing position" stuff, is distinguishable from nullable types, etc. Unlike `sequence`, any object can be a `record`, which mostly affects distinguishability` checking. I would be quite happy with that, since that's what Gecko implements for MozMap already. I just wish I hadn't wasted the time to align Gecko with the current IDL spec here. :( If we're all agreed with that, do you or @jyasskin have bandwidth to update IDL? If not, I can try to do that. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/479#issuecomment-278127001
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 20:18:34 UTC