Re: [whatwg/fetch] Is a missing HeadersInit treated differently from an empty one? (#479)

The `Response` object constructor step 6.1 is indeed copypasta per https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/commit/5ba51869de20aa191953eddbabb16015d4493f8f and needs to be removed. I'll wait with that until we have a plan.

If in general we want omission and `{}` to be equivalent, perhaps we should introduce `[AllowOmission]` now (well soon) attributes are easier to use.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/479#issuecomment-278113254

Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 19:29:23 UTC