- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:28:22 -0800
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 19:29:23 UTC
The `Response` object constructor step 6.1 is indeed copypasta per https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/commit/5ba51869de20aa191953eddbabb16015d4493f8f and needs to be removed. I'll wait with that until we have a plan. If in general we want omission and `{}` to be equivalent, perhaps we should introduce `[AllowOmission]` now (well soon) attributes are easier to use. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/479#issuecomment-278113254
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2017 19:29:23 UTC