- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 07:30:43 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 15:31:24 UTC
I agree that at some point the API will fail to scale, but I think some the issues here are down to implementation. For example, I wrote a test that isolates the read time from the write time and see this in firefox: 1) browser does not crash 2) cache.keys() takes ~900ms to complete Your current test case did not wait for the cache.put() writes to complete before starting the cache.keys(). This is the code I ran: ``` function fill(cache) { let list = []; for (let i = 0; i < 30000; ++i) { list.push(cache.put('https://example.com/probably-crash-' + i, new Response('ok'))) } return Promise.all(list); } function read(cache) { let start = performance.now(); cache.keys().then(keys => { let end = performance.now(); console.log(end - start); }) } caches.open('foo').then(cache => { fill(cache).then(_ => read(cache) ) }) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1066#issuecomment-277277361
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 15:31:24 UTC