- From: Boris Zbarsky <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2017 17:38:32 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 01:39:05 UTC
There is a note in https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-nullable-type that says: > Note: Although dictionary and record types can in general be nullable, they cannot when used as the type of an operation argument or a dictionary member. but I see nothing in the spec supporting the claim that a nullable record type cannot be the type of a dictionary member. The nullable-dictionary case is covered by this language in <https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#idl-dictionaries>: > If the Type is an identifier followed by ?, then the identifier must identify an interface, enumeration, callback function or typedef. (But even that doesn't handle a typedef of a dictionary!) But nothing there says anything about records. /cc @jyasskin @domenic @tobie @annevk -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/295
Received on Friday, 3 February 2017 01:39:05 UTC