- From: Simon Pieters <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:15:55 -0800
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 17:16:28 UTC
I meant in reply to "do you think that usage can be replaced with `iterable<>`?" -- the problem with that is `item()` disappears, AIUI. So we can't do that unless usage of `item()` is low enough that we can break it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/291#issuecomment-276719308
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2017 17:16:28 UTC