- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2017 05:09:02 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 16 December 2017 13:09:23 UTC
Good catch! The spec and the test don't agree now. I'm happy to change the spec if the existing implementations agree on not storing fragments. If so, I presume it wouldn't break things much, right? Also, that behavior aligns to what we do for storing scope urls. @aliams, could you confirm if it'd be okay for Edge too? /cc @jakearchibald @wanderview @mattto -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1249#issuecomment-352182516
Received on Saturday, 16 December 2017 13:09:23 UTC