- From: Jordan Harband <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 23:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 23:42:08 UTC
> Observable has been at stage 1 in the TC-39 for over a year now It's worth noting that the only meeting @jhusain has even attempted to advance the proposal beyond stage 1 at TC39 in the last few years is, according to the agendas, [May 2017](https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/902c6d30d3b054a027a1c33b8d5642b3e2632209/2017/05.md). There was a non-advancement update in [September 2016](https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/69cb34bb9346b792bdd92dd5b33beb0c7e404430/2016/09.md) regarding cancellation; prior to that, [May 2016](https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/c18e7bf7d8f32d722230d57f6f621ef4e01085d4/2016/05.md) and on 3 meeting agendas in 2015. I don't think it's a fair characterization that "TC39 is going too slow"; the committee has only been given 6 chances in the entire multi-year history of the proposal to discuss it, only one of which asked for stage 2 <sub>(it's likely that stage advancement was brought up in more than one meeting, of course; I'm not checking the notes, only the agendas - but either way, it's still not been frequently brought up)</sub> @jhusain are you planning on adding an agenda item in January to talk about Observables, and hopefully advance them? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/544#issuecomment-351561091
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 23:42:08 UTC