- From: Timothy Gu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 10:49:43 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 18:50:12 UTC
> Node could switch on the number of parameters provided to the on() method. The IDL proposed in the OP allows a second `options`-style parameter. But I'd also like to point out jQuery's [`on()`](http://api.jquery.com/on/) as evidence for that the name simply has too much historical burden to it. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/544#issuecomment-351485626
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 18:50:12 UTC