Re: [whatwg/dom] Improving ergonomics of events with Observable (#544) from Brenton Simpson on 2017-12-13 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from December 2017)

From: Brenton Simpson <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:02:52 -0800
To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/544/351455349@github.com>

Thanks for the clarification.

It's interesting to me that TC39 and WHATWG both have the ability to add JS APIs, but with different constraints.  The TC39 proposal [decides what to do based on if the first param is callable](https://tc39.github.io/proposal-observable/#observable-prototype-subscribe).  If the TC39 proposal was stage 4, the browsers would be implementing that behavior, right?  (Or maybe the TC39 proposal was supposed to be in WebIDL too and violated this.  I [hadn't heard](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-observable/issues/168) about that, but I'm not a TC39 member either).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/544#issuecomment-351455349

Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2017 17:04:35 UTC